High School Public Debate Program- World Class Schools

Video Sample Debate

Schools Involved

1. Instituto Superior Lisandro de la Torre, Argentina
2. Mother’s Pride Academy, India
3. Amarsingh Higher Secondary School, Nepal
4. Scotia-Glenville High School, New York
5. White Plains High School, New York
6. Gyan-Shikha High School, Nepal
7. 51 Secondary School, Sofia, Bulgaria
8. Primary School Horvati, Zagreb, Crotia
9. Haitan Public Schools. Sahibabad, India
10. Kalinin Gymnasium, Belarus
11. Karns City High School, Pa.
12. School 1357, Moscow, Russia
13. Gimnazija Fra Grga Martic Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
14. Doon Public Schools, New Delhi, India
15. Secondary Medical High School, Zadar, Croatia
16. Del Valle High School, Del Valle, Texas
17. Supreme Education School System, Lahore, Pakistan
18. Arambagh Girls School and College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
19. Saba High School, Tehran, Iran
20. New Frontiers Career Academy, Pretoria, South Africa
21. European Languages Schools, Bulgaria
22. National Dali High School, Taiwan
23. Kherad, Tehran, Iran
24. Burges High School, El Paso, USA
25. Horsehead High School, New York
26. Fatima Sroor Secondary for Girls, Palestine
27. Naim Frasheri High School, Durres, Albania
28. CHURCHILL CHRIST CARE ACADEMY P. O. BOX 137 ASAMANKESE E/R GHANA.
29. Ajman Private School UAE
30. Queen Zein Al Sharaf Secondary School for Girls Jordan
31. Goenka World School India
32.  Flower Public School  Golden Flower Public School,Khutar,Gola Road,Shahjahanpur,Uttar Pradesh, India
33.  Community Senior Secondary School Debojo, Ibeju, Nigeria
34.  Christ Divine Academy, Ghana
35.  Zakigonj Govt High School Village-Alamnogop, Bangladesh
36.  Izmir Kiz Lisesi, Turkey
37. A&M Consolidated High School, College Station, Texas
38.  Ngarenaro Secondary School, Arusha-Tanzania
39. Gimnazija "Svetozar Markovic", Serbia
40.  Ghana Education Service, Ghana

 

 

 

World Class Schools- High School Public Debate Rules

HIGH PUBLIC DEBATE PROGRAM (HSPDP)

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE RULES

High School Public Debate Program (HSPDP) Parliamentary Debate Guidelines and Conventions

 

Guidelines for HSPDP Debating

A note for those already participating in California High School Speech Association (CHSSA) High School Parliamentary Debating – Many of the established rules for CHSSA parliamentary debate (e.g., no materials prepared at times other than the 20 minute preparation time prior to the debate may be used during a debate) are applicable in the HSPDP format. There are differences in topic announcement, number of participants on a team, speaker time limits, Points of Information, and heckling.

Participants are expected to uphold the highest standards of personal and intellectual integrity. No student may manufacture information for use in debates; no judge may issue an unaccountable and unfair decision; no coach may suborn unethical practice. Individuals and schools may forfeit debates, awards, and league participation for violations.

There are two sides in the debate: the proposition side and the opposition side. The proposition team makes a case for the motion. The opposition team opposes the case made by the proposition team, using direct and indirect refutation. Motions for debate are generally announced 2-4 weeks prior to competitions. Impromptu topics are included in debate competitions. Typically, each league tournament includes 2 extemporaneous (pre-announced) and 2 impromptu motions for debate. Impromptu topics, drawn from current events and notable public policy issues, are announced 20 minutes prior to debates.

Sample topics from previous competitions:

  • School should be year-round.
  • US Supreme Court Justices should have term limits.
  • The United Nations should restrict the right of veto in the Security Council.
  • It is unethical to eat meat.
  • The US government should use political assassination to protect national security.
  • The United States should boycott the Beijing Olympics.
  • ‘Reality television’ does more good than harm.
  • The US should substantially increase gas taxes.
  • The Bear Stearns bailout does more harm than good.
  • The gray wolf should be a federally protected species.
  • The US should negotiate with terrorists.
  • The US should have a national identification card.

PREPARATION TIME

There is 20 minutes of preparation time from the announcement of a topic to the beginning of a debate. Debaters may use personally prepared research briefs and published material (dictionaries, periodicals, briefing papers, books, etc.) during preparation time. Debaters may also consult with coaches and other students at their school during this time. Debaters may not use electronic resources (computer, PDA, mobile phone, etc.) or during this time. Published and pre-prepared documents (those documents organized prior to the preparation time period) cannot be used during the debate. Debaters may use notes that they prepare during preparation time; they may also use notes they have prepared during the debate (e.g., notes of in the debate, also known as a ‘flowsheet.’) In other words, debaters must transcribe any advanced prepared notes or published information for use during the debate.

SPEAKER ORDER AND RESPONSIBILITIES

There are three debaters per side. Each debater gives one speech. This is the order of the speeches:

First proposition constructive – 6 minutes

This speaker makes a case for the motion for debate, providing a proof of the topic with three or four major points.

 

First opposition constructive – 6 minutes

This speaker makes several arguments against the proposition team’s case and refutes the proposition’s major points.

 

Second proposition constructive – 6 minutes

This speaker should rebuild and extend upon the proposition’s case. This means that this speaker must defend and amplify the original proposition points and refute the opposition’s major arguments.

 

Second opposition constructive – 6 minutes

This speaker amplifies the opposition arguments against the case, providing new information about why the opposition team should win the debate. This speaker should answer the proposition’s answers to the opposition team’s original arguments. This speaker may split summarization of the debate with the opposition rebuttalist.

 

Opposition rebuttal – 5 minutes

This speaker must put the debate together and explain why, given one or more arguments in the debate, the opposition team should win the debate. This speaker accounts for or refutes the proposition’s major points.

 

Proposition rebuttal – 5 minutes

This speaker should summarize the issues in the debate and explain why, even with the opposition’s arguments, the proposition teams should win the debate. This speaker accounts for all remaining major points of the opposition team.

 

POINTS OF INFORMATION

 

A Point of Information is a request that the speaker holding the floor yield time to an opponent for a statement (argument) or a question. A person applies for a point of information by standing or standing and saying Information” or “Point of Information.” A speaker may reject a point by gently waving a hand in the down position, indicating that the opponent should sit. A speaker may also reject the point verbally by saying “No, thank you.” Either method of rejecting a point attempt may be used, although the former is preferred as it is less disruptive for the speaker. If the speaker accepts a point (2 or more points ought to be accepted during any given speech), the speaker simply replies to an attempt by saying “Yes” or “I’ll take your point.” It is possible for more than one person on a team to request a point at any one time. A rejection by the speaker (by a nonverbal wave of the hand or negative verbal reply) is understood to apply to all opponents attempting a point at that time.

A Point of Information, also known as a POI, may only be attempted during the middle four minutes of each constructive speech – the 6 minutes speeches of the debate (after the first and before the last minute; the opening and closing minutes of a speech are identified as ‘protected time’ for the speaker and may not be interrupted by POIs. An accepted POI may not be more than 15 seconds.

HECKLING

Strategically directed heckling (supportive and argumentative) is permitted. Heckling is a single word or brief phrase (almost always no more than 2 words) and directed to the judge of the debate. A heckle is a reminder to the judge to pay close attention to the information immediately expressed by the speaker. Some heckles are non-verbal and supportive of teammates (e.g., applause during a speech by teammates rapping their knuckles or the palm of their hands on a desktop to encourage the judge to heed a particularly strong point being made by the speaker.) Other heckles are verbal and alert the judge to a problem in the opposing side’s argument. For example, if a member of an opposing team offers a major point without including evidence to verify her or his reasoning (i.e., the speakers does not make a complete argument, which must include ‘A-R-E,’ Assertion-Reasoning-Evidence) a person on the listening team may heckle by calling out, “Evidence.” This lets the judge know that the point is not yet an argument and should not receive the same standing as well-supported issues that are presented in the debate.

Barracking, the disruption of a speaker through constant and boorish commentary (often referred to as ‘the heckler’s veto’) is not permitted.

Views: 307

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Education Beyond Borders to add comments!

Join Education Beyond Borders

About

Noble Kelly created this Ning Network.

Donate Now!


Translate this page:

Follow us on:

Events

© 2019   Created by Noble Kelly.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service