Education Beyond Borders


YMCA International Appeals Court

Jan. 27, 28, 29, 2014



Case Argument /Evidence


Ontario Charter Challenge

Feb. 24, 25, 26, 2014

The Charter Challenge is an online simulation for High School students created to help students gain a better understanding of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Charter Challenge involves students in a collaborative, decision-making situation based on a real-world scenario.

As Ontario's only provincial appellate-level mock hearing, the Charter Challenge has students prepare arguments of Charter issues raised on appeal. While researching their arguments, students have the opportunity to connect online with other students around the province, as well as with lawyer mentors. Their factums are reviewed and finalist teams have the opportunity to argue the issue before a Court of Appeal judge, either in person or through video-conferencing.

Fall 2013 Scenario - Roy v Her Majesty the Queen

Fall 2013 Factum Template


Model Supreme Court

National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning Corporation

March 17, 18, 19, 2014



Case Information

South Australian Mock Trials

April 7, 8, 9, 2014

South Australia Mock Trial Rules


Cases For Downloads

R v Alexander

 R v Peddler         R v Crosio

Model ICC Moot Court

World Class Schools

April 25- ICC v Ottoman Empire

May 19- ICC v Harry Truman

May 20- ICC v Barrack Obama (NSA)

May 21- ICC v Stalin (Holomodor)



Will Be The 50th Anniversary

of the Warren Commission

and Their Report

Join us in an international open debate on this report.

World Class Schools


A Moot Court On The Warren Commission


This will be a moot court. There will be one judge. One school will defend the Warren Commission Report's finding and the other side will point out the serious errors in the Report. This is an interesting twist on the normal Moot Court. You still have two teams of two lawyers. The difference is that instead of arguing appellant law you are arguing facts or trying to bring about theories in front of judges who are knowledgeable of these events.


Each team will have two speakers and each will have 15 minutes to bring out their case. Thirty minutes for each side. The judge will be able to ask questions of each lawyer. They will present evidence backing up their contentions.

There are two points of error:

The first point (first speaker) The conclusions of the Warren Commission were made because of political reasons rather than evidence of what took place in Dallas on Nov. 22, 2013

The second point (second speaker) The conclusion of the Warren Commission that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman that shot President John F. Kennedy and Governor John Connally in Dallas on Nov. 22, 2013

History of the Warren Commission

President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, commonly called the Warren Commission, by Executive Order (E.O. 11130) on November 29, 1963. Its purpose was to investigate the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy on November 22, 1963, at Dallas, Texas. President Johnson directed the Commission to evaluate matters relating to the assassination and the subsequent killing of the alleged assassin, and to report its findings and conclusions to him.

Now 50th years later- let begin to discuss what really happened

Be there on

May 29, 2014

The 97th anniversary

of John Kennedy's Birth

The Day

This Will Finally

Goes To Court


The Information

The Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board Final Report

Warren Commission Report

Report of the President's Commission on the Assassination of Presid...

Views: 93

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Education Beyond Borders to add comments!

Join Education Beyond Borders


Noble Kelly created this Ning Network.

Donate Now!

Translate this page:

Follow us on:


© 2021   Created by Noble Kelly.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service